HUNTING BAN: Labour must learn from Scotland's mistakes
HUNTING BAN: Labour must learn from Scotland's mistakes
'Licencing scheme' allowing hunts to continue as before
It was a seemingly momentous victory when Scotland banned hunting with dogs. One year on, its legislation is failing wildlife. The Labour government has promised to properly ban hunting too - but it needs to learn from its neighbour's mistakes.
Campaigners described it as a "landmark moment" when, late in the evening on 24 January 2023, the Scottish parliament voted to pass the Hunting With Dogs (Scotland) Bill after a seven hour debate. The Bill became an Act in law on 7 March 2023, making it illegal to flush out a wild animal with more than two dogs. But it wasn't until 3 October 2023 that the law could actually be enforced. The reason? NatureScot was finalising a licensing scheme to “allow farmers and other land managers to use more than two dogs, in limited circumstances, for appropriate and humane wildlife control.”
The licensing loophole
This licensing scheme has proved to be controversial. It is, wildlife campaigners argue, just another loophole in legislation to allow hunters to get away with murder. Back in August of this year, the Daily Record reported that NatureScot had issued more than 40 licences between November 2023 and April 2024. In 31 of these licences, the use of more than 20 dogs was permitted.
The Scottish Greens are attempting to hold Holyrood to account. The party's Ariane Burgess told the Daily Record this week:
"The Scottish Government is showing staggering complacency if this is how they envisaged the system working. The number of licences that have been issued makes clear that this is being treated as a loophole and exploited."
On 2 October, the Greens submitted a question during Portfolio Questions at the Scottish Parliament regarding this new loophole. But instead of recognising that the new legislation is failing wildlife, ministers defended the new law. Agriculture and Connectivity Minister Jim Fairlie argued that licences are needed for farmers to carry out "predator control" and to protect "livestock". He said:
“The licensing scheme in the 2023 is act not a loophole… Fox hunting is absolutely against the principles of the people of Scotland, but predator control is not."
The Countryside Alliance (CA) - a lobby group which tries to overturn the ban on foxhunting - celebrated Fairlie's words, calling them "pleasing". This alone is a red flag - a sure sign that legislation IS being exploited to favour fox hunting. The CA said:
"This question from the Scottish Greens suggesting a loophole in the licensing system that they supported is not wholly unsurprising. They were more than happy to claim victory when the new law was passed last year yet are now unhappy that the licence scheme is doing what it should be doing – enabling the use of more than two dogs to flush foxes to guns under very strict and rigorous licensing conditions for the protection of livestock and for environmental benefit purposes where there is no effective alternative."
We need a PROPER ban
Meanwhile, in England and Wales, campaigners such as Chris Packham, and, of course, hunt saboteurs and monitors, continue to do vital work, reminding Keir Starmer and Labour of its manifesto promise: to strengthen the Hunting Act, closing the trail hunting loophole. While we stand with our fellow wildlife defenders, Protect the Wild argues that the government actually needs to go a huge step further, completely replacing the current law.
Protect the Wild's Glen Black said:
"If Labour decides to follow through on its manifesto pledge to crackdown on hunting in England and Wales, the Scottish example must serve as a lesson. It's not enough to simply ban trail hunting or to introduce a licensing system. Any new law must make it impossible for mounted hunts and foot packs to operate at all."
That's why we have commissioned Advocates for Animals to draft the Hunting of Mammals Bill. Our new Bill is far more than just an update of the Hunting Act. If it became an Act in law, it would stop hunting in its tracks, and finally give wildlife much-needed protection from illegal hunting.
The loopholes and exemptions that hunts use need to be removed entirely, not argued about for years to come. Please help us make the Hunting of Mammals Bill become law.
It’s that time of the year again! Celebrate the festive season and support Protect the Wild in the process! It’s a win win! Our Xmas card packs are just £6.50 each too, providing great value :)
I have already signed your "PROPER ban on hunting" petition and fully support it all the way. How could using dogs to "flush out wild animals" even possibly be considered "humane" in any way, for the wild animals AND/OR the dogs??!!! You only have to hear of the unimaginable suffering, cruelly drawn out for so long, and disfigurement of both the wild animals and the dogs, used by sadistic "baiters", to know that using dogs to find, "flush out" and attack wildlife is NOT or could EVER be considered "humane", in ANY WAY!!! I am very disappointed as I always thought that Scotland was better than this. Also, how is so called "predator control", aka, most likely "culling", any different to hunting when BOTH involve violent murder/killing!! And as Protect the Wild also rightly mentioned, sick hunting "supporters" often use the words/excuse of "carrying out predator control" to try and "justify" them sadistically hunting and killing wild animals 🤬🤬🤬!! The one "predator" though that I do agree with carrying out "predator control" on is, THE MOST overpopulated, invasive, environmentally destructive and cruelest species of all (not all of us though), humans!!!
Its about time starmer and his cronies cut to the chase. Wildlife are suffering horrific deaths by psychos that should be punished. It really pi.... me off that nothing has been done and the main topics this government have covered is designer clothing glasses and taylor swift concerts , and attacking the older generation that have worked hard all their lives. Hunting and killing animals is medieval and should be banished to the history books.