A remarkable text relating the reality of Charlie's hypocrisy and constant wild life abuser and killer. I was glad to see also that the nature of his former concubine is also disclosed. I would believe that Diana's dislike of blood sports and her desire not to have her sons involved in it likely contributed to Charlie's inability to sincerely love and support a more beautiful, young and modern gentler minded woman. The sooner the current pair of throne squatters are gone the better.
But thats not mentioned in this article as you seem to be implying. Please correct me if I am wrong. I agree with you about the promise to strengthen the hunting ban, and I am disappointed they have not consulted on it yet, but I am sure it will given time, hopefully very soon now.
My comments stem from the article which states that the king and his family all hunt which is supposedly banned. I hope you are right that the proper ban will happen soon. However, you have more faith than I.
Hi Maggie. I think that refers long over 20 years ago, maybe they still do, but its not mentioned in the article "the King and his family all hunt". I do have a lot of faith in this government, I cant see an alternative party that offers anything better and certainly we do not want Reform who's leader Farage has vowed to reverse any ban should they be elected. I wouldn't trust the Tories either. I am also a supporter of the league Against Cruel Sports, they seem quite optimistic a consultation will start soon. Fingers crossed.
Reading this just makes my blood boil.I hope the controversy surrounding the hideous activities of one member of this entitled ,dysfunctional family who have a collective IQ the size of a postage stamp and for whom the word hypocrisy could have been invented brings into the public persona questions about their obscene wealth and relevance in the 21st century!
Last year whilst on a U3A holiday in Norfolk we had a coach tour to Sandringham. The visit to the estate also included a tour of the ground floor of the house. We entered the house via a lobby into a very large and grand living room. It looked a comfortable living room furnished with the most expensive furniture money could buy. I would estimate the size of the room would be about 10 times or more larger than mine at home. There were many photographs of the royal family past and present, but no sign of Randy Andy, Harry and Edward VIII the king that abdicated. After the living room we moved on to what I would describe as the killing room. A large room with three of its four walls fitted with glass fronted gun cases. Each case was crammed full of shot guns, each gun probably worth more than the value of my house!! The other wall contained photos of their murderous activities, not nice. The next room was a large room displaying fashion garments made from sustainable materials, I suppose that is in line with the Kings green credentials. It seemed very hypocritical to me.
I totally agree with every single word that Rob has written - as usual. But please may I put forward another aspect to King Charles? I first met him just over 20 years ago when Paul (my husband) and I went to the opening of the Prince of Waes Centre in Oxford. At the time my view of PC was mostly negative but I learned that there was something else to take into my thinking. My husband had severe BiPolar Disorder and had been discharged from hospital only 4 days earlier where he had been recovering from a suicide attempt. PC heard of this from the organiser of the event and he made changes to the event which make Paul's visit much easier.
Paul's painting was 'unveiled' at the event and PC went 25 minutes over the alloted time so that he could discuss the painting in more depth. I cannot overstate what that meant to Paul - who had been a long way from a monarchist!
There were 2 or 3 handwritten letters a year from PC to Paul - they were so encouraging but very sadly Paul took his life in 2006 - he was 47. I was very surprised to receive a long handwritten letter from PC just a couple of weeks later. The big thing to bear in mind is that their only meeting was just between the 2 of them - I was nearby but there was no-one else who could have heard their conversation but PC had very obviously remembered it in detail.
So he is not only a sadistic wildlife killer but he is also a deeply concerned mental health advocate and supporter. Like many of us, he has 2 sides to his character. Surely something else to think about?
This does not help wee vixens being torn apart by hounds driven by sadists inc Charles and Camilla disgusting priviledge needs banned totally sick of cruelty to animals britain 🩸🤮😡
I totally agree with you which is why I simply said that there is another side to Charles' character. I did not and would not in any way excuse the sadistic treatment of any wildlife.
Not my King. The royal family are all hypocritical, entitled and greedy.
If you have not seen it and want a more in depth analysis of the royals, watch the recent documentary with David Dimbelby on the BBC. Time for a republic.
The BBC is hypocritical, entitled & greedy. Needs abolishing, same as bloodthirsty royal family.
Hunting wildlife needs abolishing. There are too many bad things in this country that date from at least a century ago & the ESTABLISHMENT that keeps them going needs bringing to its knees & begging for mercy.
Pamela, the programme is called “what’s the monarchy for” it’s a refreshingly open and honest series which highlights the monarchy’s wealth and entitlement Well worth a watch
Chuck3's self-congratulatory video reveals his narcissism. He was even filmed watching it & chuckling at himself. Hoped William's children would be brought up to be champions of wildlife & to advocate the end of hunting/shooting, but no such luck. He's another one that goes on about the environment but thinks it's OK to blast birds out of the sky. No regard at all for what the majority of Brits think of that.
Climate change is bunkum & so is the RF. It is now at its nadir & most unpopular, so a Republic may be on the cards in the not-too-distant future.
He's the worst kind of sadist....a hypocrital one. Horrible, corrupt family. A disgrace.
The whole Windsor family are vile fake hypocrites!!!
They are good at acting out certain roles to gain back the people who are clearly blinded by their fake royalty?
Why Britain supports this So called royal family is beyond me?
They are literally killers and abusers!!!
Always coming out smelling of roses.
And the little Queen was part of it all.
It's only a matter of time for these people.....
Truly grateful for Protect The Wild ♡
Thankyou for All Your Hard Work ☆☆☆
I hate that family with a passion. Nothing but scumbags who contribute nothing to the planet.
The UK and all it's wildlife would be so much better off without ANY of the so called "royal family"!! Anti monarchy all the way!!
A remarkable text relating the reality of Charlie's hypocrisy and constant wild life abuser and killer. I was glad to see also that the nature of his former concubine is also disclosed. I would believe that Diana's dislike of blood sports and her desire not to have her sons involved in it likely contributed to Charlie's inability to sincerely love and support a more beautiful, young and modern gentler minded woman. The sooner the current pair of throne squatters are gone the better.
More lies by the government. When will we have a government that are truthful? As for our king😡😡😡😡
What lies by the government are you referring to in this article?
They promised to strengthen the hunting ban and stop all hunting with dogs. - WHEN?
But thats not mentioned in this article as you seem to be implying. Please correct me if I am wrong. I agree with you about the promise to strengthen the hunting ban, and I am disappointed they have not consulted on it yet, but I am sure it will given time, hopefully very soon now.
My comments stem from the article which states that the king and his family all hunt which is supposedly banned. I hope you are right that the proper ban will happen soon. However, you have more faith than I.
Hi Maggie. I think that refers long over 20 years ago, maybe they still do, but its not mentioned in the article "the King and his family all hunt". I do have a lot of faith in this government, I cant see an alternative party that offers anything better and certainly we do not want Reform who's leader Farage has vowed to reverse any ban should they be elected. I wouldn't trust the Tories either. I am also a supporter of the league Against Cruel Sports, they seem quite optimistic a consultation will start soon. Fingers crossed.
When cows jump over the moon 👺
Kinda naive.
All of them 🤯
What all the cows? Lol
Waste of taxpayers money the lot of them are scroungers x hypocrites
Reading this just makes my blood boil.I hope the controversy surrounding the hideous activities of one member of this entitled ,dysfunctional family who have a collective IQ the size of a postage stamp and for whom the word hypocrisy could have been invented brings into the public persona questions about their obscene wealth and relevance in the 21st century!
Last year whilst on a U3A holiday in Norfolk we had a coach tour to Sandringham. The visit to the estate also included a tour of the ground floor of the house. We entered the house via a lobby into a very large and grand living room. It looked a comfortable living room furnished with the most expensive furniture money could buy. I would estimate the size of the room would be about 10 times or more larger than mine at home. There were many photographs of the royal family past and present, but no sign of Randy Andy, Harry and Edward VIII the king that abdicated. After the living room we moved on to what I would describe as the killing room. A large room with three of its four walls fitted with glass fronted gun cases. Each case was crammed full of shot guns, each gun probably worth more than the value of my house!! The other wall contained photos of their murderous activities, not nice. The next room was a large room displaying fashion garments made from sustainable materials, I suppose that is in line with the Kings green credentials. It seemed very hypocritical to me.
I totally agree with every single word that Rob has written - as usual. But please may I put forward another aspect to King Charles? I first met him just over 20 years ago when Paul (my husband) and I went to the opening of the Prince of Waes Centre in Oxford. At the time my view of PC was mostly negative but I learned that there was something else to take into my thinking. My husband had severe BiPolar Disorder and had been discharged from hospital only 4 days earlier where he had been recovering from a suicide attempt. PC heard of this from the organiser of the event and he made changes to the event which make Paul's visit much easier.
Paul's painting was 'unveiled' at the event and PC went 25 minutes over the alloted time so that he could discuss the painting in more depth. I cannot overstate what that meant to Paul - who had been a long way from a monarchist!
There were 2 or 3 handwritten letters a year from PC to Paul - they were so encouraging but very sadly Paul took his life in 2006 - he was 47. I was very surprised to receive a long handwritten letter from PC just a couple of weeks later. The big thing to bear in mind is that their only meeting was just between the 2 of them - I was nearby but there was no-one else who could have heard their conversation but PC had very obviously remembered it in detail.
So he is not only a sadistic wildlife killer but he is also a deeply concerned mental health advocate and supporter. Like many of us, he has 2 sides to his character. Surely something else to think about?
This does not help wee vixens being torn apart by hounds driven by sadists inc Charles and Camilla disgusting priviledge needs banned totally sick of cruelty to animals britain 🩸🤮😡
I totally agree with you which is why I simply said that there is another side to Charles' character. I did not and would not in any way excuse the sadistic treatment of any wildlife.
Not my King. The royal family are all hypocritical, entitled and greedy.
If you have not seen it and want a more in depth analysis of the royals, watch the recent documentary with David Dimbelby on the BBC. Time for a republic.
The BBC is hypocritical, entitled & greedy. Needs abolishing, same as bloodthirsty royal family.
Hunting wildlife needs abolishing. There are too many bad things in this country that date from at least a century ago & the ESTABLISHMENT that keeps them going needs bringing to its knees & begging for mercy.
Pamela, the programme is called “what’s the monarchy for” it’s a refreshingly open and honest series which highlights the monarchy’s wealth and entitlement Well worth a watch
Thank you for this
All bloodsports need ended now Cruelty by Royals not acceptable anymore public not stupid ! Dont believe in Royals all cruel 🦊🩸🤮🏴
Chuck3's self-congratulatory video reveals his narcissism. He was even filmed watching it & chuckling at himself. Hoped William's children would be brought up to be champions of wildlife & to advocate the end of hunting/shooting, but no such luck. He's another one that goes on about the environment but thinks it's OK to blast birds out of the sky. No regard at all for what the majority of Brits think of that.
Climate change is bunkum & so is the RF. It is now at its nadir & most unpopular, so a Republic may be on the cards in the not-too-distant future.
👹👹