Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lin's avatar

The stuff needs to be banned. It’s a bloody disgrace that it’s being sold in the first place !! Poisoning wildlife is a crime against nature ! The insecticide that kills bees should be banned too , another crime !!Governments know what’s poison and what’s not !

Expand full comment
Charlie Moores's avatar

Hi all. I just wanted to comment here too on how difficult it is to get convictions in cases like this. Unfortunately it is extremely dfficult to prove with certainty who actually commits the crime, in this case which individual (and in wildlife crime cases like this the law prosecutes individuals) actually laid the poison with the intent of killing a protected bird of prey - there are never witnesses, very little in the way of forensic evidence, and keepers never reveal crimes they undoubtedly know about. Should the police go after the estate owner? Landowners in England have fiercely fought against the implementation of 'vicarious liability' (in other words, the estate where a crime had been committed could be considered liable for the actions of its employees) - but even though Scotland has had VL for some years there have hardly been any convictons at all: estates simply say, 'I instructed my employees not to break the law' , and if they hold even one hour's worth of instruction on the law etc it is (as I understand it) incredibly difficult for a court to then prove that an employer or estate owner is liable. Bendiocarb is fast acting but I don't think there is sufficient documentary evidence to claim with certainty that the bird DIDN'T ingest poison and then fly a few miles before dropping dead, which makes it even more difficult to prove where exactly the poison was laid and by whom. It is incredibly frustrating - wildlife crimes are covered in a fog of uncertainty that our current laws and current judicial system can't penetrate. We can suspect all we like that this bird was killed to 'protect' pheasants (the buzzard was found in August just before the shooting season started) but unless the police have evidence we don't know about (and they may) it's going to very hard indeed to prove it - and I don't think anyone would seriously argue that laws that protect us as citizens should be applied differently to shooting estates or their employers. Don't get me wrong, I want these crimes to stop, I want shooting to end, but I don't want to give wildlife criminals a platform to claim they're being treated unfairly either. We need more resources put into tackling these crimes, we need people within the shooting industry (while it lasts) to speak up and hand over criminals, we need shooters to make it clear they want nothing to do with wildlife crime instead of looking the other way as thye largely do now. and we need the schools/colleges that train these people to understand that birds of prey have a rightful place in any landscape and ecosystem in the country. Most of all we need to get rid of the shooting industry, but at least while we're doing that we should expect it to clean its bloody act up.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts